Register

Log in


Help Keep the Blog Running

Running the blog takes a good amount of scratch. If you find the time and effort I put in to finding stuff for the blog or facebook, any donations to offset the costs are appreciated. Five or $10 can go a long way. Thanks, Chris Spangle.

Archives

Council President admits to putting the Team before the Taxpayer

by Chris Spangle ~ March 8th, 2009

The Star wrote that we didn’t expect the Republican-controlled city-council to put the part before the taxpayer, but we did. It is why I am a member of the Libertarian Party now, and not the Republican Party.

At least Cockrum isn’t hiding the fact that they did this out of retribution, and there was no real merit for removing Coleman:

From the Indy Star’s Behind Closed Doors:

Liberated from influence

City-County Council member Ed Coleman found last week that it’s lonely being a party of one.

After he switched from the Republican Party to the Libertarians last month, the GOP leadership stripped him of his council committee positions Monday. Coleman had said he thought the Republicans were playing the same power games to suppress dissenting views that they used to criticize Democrats when that party controlled the council.

Barbara Malone replaced Coleman on the Rules and Public Policy Committee, and Ryan Vaughntook his place on the Economic Development Committee.

Coleman and the Libertarians were outraged.

“The committee rules aren’t set up in a way to recognize three parties,” said Tim Maguire, the county Libertarian chairman. “But we’re here to stay, and they better get used to it.”

Coleman said the changes were proof of the partisan politics that led him to leave the party in the first place.

Others seemed amused that he didn’t expect retribution.

Bob Cockrum, the council president, said he knew Coleman was unhappy. But Cockrum said he needed to ensure GOP control of those committees. With Coleman’s vote in the air, he could swing the majority and effectively control the committee.

“When you stray, you have to take the results,” Cockrum told the Republican caucus. “It’s a no-win situation. People who helped him campaign feel betrayed, too.”

Other Republicans asked Cockrum whether Coleman would vote with the Democrats.

“I called (Minority Leader) Joanne (Sanders),” Cockrum said. “She said, ‘He’s not my minority.’ “

  • Freelunch
    Coleman still has a vote at every council meeting. Plus, there is nothing that I know of preventing him from attending, speaking. commenting and questioning at the committee meetings.
  • Jeff Scherschel
    I see that I am pretty late in this, but I just now found this wonderful website, nice job by the way Chris. What Mr. Coleman did was wonderful, and to think that the GOP would not retain control of certain committees is silly. I am sure that Mr. Coleman would have supported a GOP leaning agenda, he just didn't like the party anymore and the GOP being the bullies they and the Dems are simply reacted like bullies do. Kick him out and pretend he's not there is very childish and I would expect more from professionals. But of course we are talking about the GOP and the DNC.
    Great job Mr Coleman, you have my support.
  • Computergeek
    He did NOT call you an idiot B&T. He said that was what you were calling someone who thinks for themself. It's called "reading comprehension". Look into it.
  • IndyCurmudgeon
    Bill & Ted -

    When I or someone else has a different perspective, it is never "silly"...its just an opinion. If this is an argument that you want to win, start by making a valid point or showing the flaw in my reasoning rather that saying I'm silly or pejorative.

    1. The Dem "agenda" did not lose in the 2007 election...a few Dems lost which shifted the "balance of power".

    2. The GOP is not losing committee control because of Coleman. Coleman is gone, whether he went Lib or Dem. Maybe if the GOP councilmen have stronger planning, work across the aisle and find solutions to our current budget issues we could all win!

    3. Coleman has not made himself irrelevant. The last I checked he has a few more years left on the council and a vote on most major issues so he will sink or swim accordingly.

    4. Also, when you say they should recruit "like minded R's", what would such a person be?
  • Bill and Ted
    IndyCurmudgeon, good job entering the conversation with a pejorative. You really know how to score the big debate points. 2 things.

    1. The GOP would be stupid to lose control of a committees b/c of Coleman, the Dem agenda is terrible and was voted down by Marion County voters in 2007.

    2. Coleman has made himself irrelevant. Yes I respect him for standing up, but come on, he is done. Why not recruit more like minded R's. They are out there. I have seen them.

    Next time you want to make a point avoid the putdown, just makes you look silly.
  • IndyCurmudgeon
    By that rationale, your an idiot if you stand one principle, think for yourself and go against the good ole' boy system?

    I respect Councilman Coleman's decision and disagree with the Republican party leader pulling him from committee's.

    This proves conclusively that they will seek retribution if you do not walk the line. Just the very fact that they have the power to do this shows who is really in charge of our government, and it's certainly not the voters!
  • Bill and Ted
    Coleman is an idiot, he has guaranteed he will not be re-elected and has no influence over any policy, he took a 4 year term and turned it into 15 minutes of fame. I know Chris, blah blah blah stand up for your principles, blah blah blah, two party system bad, blah blah blah. I agree but in this situation a lot more can be accomplished by working within the structure. What a waste.
blog comments powered by Disqus